XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, rec.pets.dogs.health, misc.rural
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:10:48 +0100, Derek wrote:
>On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 08:37:04 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 22:37:17 +0100, Derek wrote:
>>>On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 13:48:33 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 18:24:58 +0100, Derek wrote:
>>>>>On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 12:03:56 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 13:30:10 +0100, Derek wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>Answer the question and tell me which animals
>>>>>>>feel pride. You tried to ridicule others for failing
>>>>>>>to at the start of this thread, and now you're
>>>>>>>doing exactly that yourself: failing to explain
>>>>>>>which animals do and why.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Birds do.
>>>>>
>>>>>Then why do you breed cocks to fight each other
>>>>>to the death, and why is this not a show of utter
>>>>>contempt for these allegedly prideful birds,
>>>>
>>>> Because they like it.
>>>
>>>You have no valid argument to support that claim,
>>
>> Yes I do.
>
>No, you haven't.
I haven't shared them with you, because you intend
to remain deliberately ignorant, as well as being stupid
which I will agree you have no real control over. That
all being the case though, there is no point wasting
our time on something you don't give a shit about anyway.
>You're an animal abuser without
>any reason for doing what you do apart the ugly
>fact that you enjoy doing it. That's the kind of
>low-life scum you are, Harrison, so don't whine
>when your opinions on these animal-related
>groups are ignored.
What I have learned is from experience, and one
thing I've learned from experience it that people like
youself who have none, don't have any clue what
the hell you're pretending to discuss.
>>>>>>Dogs
>>>>>
>>>>>Do you condone dog fighting as well as cock
>>>>>fighting?
>>>>
>>>> No. If you want to know why, then you must make
>>>>an attempt to figure out why for yourself first.
>>>
>>>Being that you have no valid argument to support
>>>your claim that prideful cocks "like" to fight each
>>>other to the death for your amusement, you have
>>>no valid argument for excluding dogs from fighting
>>>each other, either.
>>
>> You have proven to be too ignorant
>
>Rather,
There is no rather, there is you proving that you
don't give a shit about the subject in the first place,
and you're too stupid to discuss it intelligently even
if you were to try, which we both know you never
will.
>you have proven beyond all doubt that,
>being an animal abuser who breeds cocks to
>fight in pits for your enjoyment, you also
>condone dog fighting for those same reasons
>as well. You abuse animals to their deaths for
>mere enjoyment and offer no reason why you
>would exclude other animals from this abuse,
>so I can only assume that you DO condone
>dog fighting but daren't admit to it on a public
>forum.
>
>>>>>>and cats do. Probably most
>>>>>>mammals are capable of it, even if the conditions
>>>>>>never arise to trigger that feeling in some particular
>>>>>>animals who are capable of feeling it.
>>>>>
>>>>>Then your diet on these allegedly prideful animals
>>>>>is truly immoral while asserting your own "proper
>>>>>dignity or value", Harrison.
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>
>>>Absolutely yes, Harrison.
>>
>> No. You don't tell me.
>
>Yes, I do get to tell you,
LOL! You do not. You don't even qualify to form any
opinion about me, much less tell me anything about
the morality of my diet. Your opinion is worth less than
that of the chickens who died for my dinner. Not only is
your opinion based on complete ignorance, but it's
also tiny and restricted to the point that it grossly distorts
reality...a fact that I can see clearly but you are completely
unaware of.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
