XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, rec.pets.cats.misc, alt.pets.rabbits
XPost: rec.pets.birds
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 14:51:42 -0600, Leslie wrote:
>Found scrawled in the outhouse on Mon, 04 Jul 2005 10:44:15 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:11:01 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>
>>>dh@. wrote:
>>
>>>> Domestic animals are
>>>> completely dependant on us for the pairing of sperm and egg which
>>>> begin their particular lives. Those particular animals only exist because
>>>> humans raise them, and if they were set free so humans no longer
>>>> had such infuence the same animals would not be born. The human
>>>> situation is different because humans are already free.
>>>
>>>Completely false. All humans ALSO are dependent on the
>>>thoughts and actions of earlier humans for the pairing
>>>of the sperm and egg that results in a new human. They
>>>are no different from these domestic animals you
>>>misunderstand.
>>
>> Yes they are. They are free to travel the world in search of someone
>>else to fuck. Domestic animals are not. It's another one of those things
>>you're just too stupid to understand.
>
>OIC. So Barney, the neighborhood mutt, hasn't just "traveled freely" across
several
>hundred acres to fuck a bitch on somebody else's place, resulting in 8 little
muttleys?
>Barney is a domestic dog. He is owned. That NEVER implies that he is without
freedom or
>means to cross his boundaries to breed any bitch in season he can smell.
There are leash laws in most places I'm aware of. Even if there were not,
the dogs are dependant on their masters, and are directly influenced by
where their masters allow them to go.
>Gotta hand it to you, FW. You are a LOT stupider than I thought possible.
You have certainly proven the same thing about yourself to me. It's really
hard to believe you are too stupid to understand that humans have a lot
of influence over where their dogs are able to mate, but you admittedly are
that stupid.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
