XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, rec.pets.dogs.behavior, re   
   .pets.cats.misc   
   XPost: alt.pets.rabbits   
      
   On 9 Apr 2006 00:37:00 -0700, rupertmccallum@yahoo.com wrote:   
      
   >   
   >dh@. wrote:   
   >> On 7 Apr 2006 17:56:45 -0700, rupertmccallum@yahoo.com wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >   
   >> >dh@. wrote:   
   >> >> On 5 Apr 2006 20:21:59 -0700, rupertmccallum@yahoo.com wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >> >Their objective is not to eliminate domestic animals, it is   
   >> >> >to eliminate exploitation of domenstic animals.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>     They want to eliminate animals raised for food.   
   >> >   
   >> >They want to eliminate exploitation of animals raised for food. If a   
   >> >side-effect of that is that no more animals are bred, so be it.   
   >>   
   >>     That's not a side effect. That's the intended goal, which is the   
   complete   
   >> opposite of decent Animal Welfare. People in favor of AW need to be   
   >> very opposed to "ar"!   
   >   
   >No, it's a side-effect. Animal rights people would have no problem if   
   >for some reason people wanted to keep breeding livestock, as long as   
   >they stopped exploiting and killing them.   
      
        They want to eliminate animals raised for food.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)