XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, rec.pets.dogs.behavior, re   
   .pets.cats.misc   
   XPost: alt.pets.rabbits   
      
   On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 Goo wrote:   
      
   >dh pointed out:   
   >   
   >> On 14 Apr 2006 17:03:48 -0700, "Dave"  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>dh asked:   
   >   
   >>>>    WTF are you trying to talk about?   
   >>>   
   >>>I am correcting your claim that people in favour of livestock being   
   >>>raised and killed humanely should necessarily be opposed to them being   
   >>>eliminated althogether.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>     They necessarily should be.   
   >   
   >No, Fuckwit.  That is utterly illogical.   
   >   
   >Once again, Fuckwit:  being in favor of humane   
   >treatment for livestock is CONDITIONAL on the livestock   
   >existing in the first place.   
      
       I know that's one of the deepest and most complex aspects   
   of the situation that you're capable of grasping Goo, but it's realy   
   very obvious to anyone else so you should stop pretending that it's   
   something special that needs to be pointed out.   
      
   >Being in favor of humane   
   >treatment for livestock does NOT mean one is in favor   
   >of the livestock existing in the first place.   
      
       Even if such an absurd claim were true, Goo, we're discussing   
   "people in favour of livestock being raised and killed", which   
   necessarily requires that the animals exist, you poor, stupid Goober.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)