home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.pets.dogs.misc      All other topics, chat, humor, etc      8,070 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 7,281 of 8,070   
   Eden to All   
   Re: Animal Welfare or "animal rights"?   
   19 Apr 06 18:02:35   
   
   XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, rec.pets.dogs.behavior, re   
   .pets.cats.misc   
   XPost: alt.pets.rabbits   
   From: s.e.maizlisch@hertzburg.eduu   
      
   Fuckwit David Harrison, ignorant cracker whom David   
   Eitelbach, John Mercer, Martin Martens ridiculed and   
   despised, blabbered:   
      
   > On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 Leif Erikson wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   >>Fuckwit David Harrison, ignorant cracker whom David Eitelbach, John Mercer,   
   Martin Martens ridiculed and despised, blabbered:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>On 14 Apr 2006 17:03:48 -0700, "Dave"  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>Fuckwit David Harrison, ignorant cracker whom David Eitelbach, John   
   Mercer, Martin Martens ridiculed and despised, blabbered:   
   >>   
   >>>>>   WTF are you trying to talk about?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>I am correcting your claim that people in favour of livestock being   
   >>>>raised and killed humanely should necessarily be opposed to them being   
   >>>>eliminated althogether.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>    They necessarily should be.   
   >>   
   >>No, Fuckwit.  That is utterly illogical.   
   >>   
   >>Once again, Fuckwit:  being in favor of humane   
   >>treatment for livestock is CONDITIONAL on the livestock   
   >>existing in the first place.   
   >   
   >   
   >     I know that's one of the deepest and most complex aspects   
   > of the situation that you're capable of grasping   
      
   And you are INCAPABLE of grasping, Fuckwit.   
      
      
   > should stop pretending that it's   
   > something special that needs to be pointed out.   
      
   It escapes you, Fuckwit, so I need to keep pointing it   
   out.  I don't need to point it out to anyone else,   
   Fuckwit; just you.  It is due to your utter inability   
   to keep up; you are FAR behind everyone who can truly   
   think about these issues.   
      
      
   >>Being in favor of humane   
   >>treatment for livestock does NOT mean one is in favor   
   >>of the livestock existing in the first place.   
   >   
   >   
   >     Even if such an absurd claim were true,   
      
   It IS true, Fuckwit.  You are just too far behind to   
   understand why it matters.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca