XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.sci.sociology, alt.stupidity   
      
   On 16 Jan 2007 19:29:02 -0800, "Rupert"  wrote:   
      
   >   
   >dh@. wrote:   
   >> On 16 Jan 2007 02:47:26 -0800, "Rupert"  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >   
   >> >dh@. wrote:   
   >> >> On 10 Jan 2007 20:38:05 -0800, "Rupert"  wrote:   
   >> >>   
   >> >> >dh@. wrote:   
   >> >> >> On 8 Jan 2007 15:35:24 -0800, "Rupert"    
   wrote:   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >> >I think you overestimate the adverse impact of AR terrorism on the   
   >> >> >> >well-being of humans and nonhumans,   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >> It always makes things worse. It slows down progress, including   
   >> >> >> progress towards finding alternatives to animal testing.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >Nonsense.   
   >> >>   
   >> >>     You'll be slightly more honest below...   
   >> >>   
   >> >   
   >> >It is, in my view, nonsense that any form of animal rights extremism   
   >> >has had any adverse impact on developing alternatives to animal   
   >> >testing.   
   >>   
   >>     Bullshit. You ADMITTED that it does   
   >>   
   >> >I really can't be bothered talking to you if you're going to   
   >> >insinuate that I'm being dishonest.   
   >>   
   >> "They want to make animal exploitation more expensive." Translation:   
   >>   
   >> They want to make everything that has to do with animal testing more   
   >> expensive,   
   >   
   >You're not very bright, are you?   
      
       I'm bright enough to understand that they either want to make everything   
   that has to do with animal testing more expensive, or they are too stupid   
   to understand that's what they're doing. Which do you think it is?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)