XPost: alt.gossip.celebrities, alt.law-enforcement, alt.pets.dogs   
   XPost: alt.true-crime   
   From: theprof@jonez.net   
      
   Red wrote:   
   > On Aug 5, 8:51?pm, BTR1701  wrote:   
   >>  Red  wrote:   
   >>> On Aug 5, 3:31?pm, BTR1701  wrote:   
   >>>>  Red  wrote:   
   >>>>> On Aug 4, 8:29?am, BTR1701  wrote:   
   >>>>>>  Red  wrote:   
   >>>>>>> Hopefully the man's family will sue Rhames and take all his   
   >>>>>>> money.   
   >>   
   >>>>>> Why?   
   >>   
   >>>>> I think the answer has something to do with personal   
   >>>>> responsibility. Perhaps you have heard of it?   
   >>   
   >>>> Well, until it's determined that Rhames was personally   
   >>>> responsible, it seems odd to be a cheerleader for taking all of   
   >>>> his money.   
   >>   
   >>> If they were his dogs my friend, he is responsible.   
   >>   
   >> Not necessarily.- Hide quoted text -   
   >>   
   >> - Show quoted text -   
   >   
   > OK, you were responsible, how's that!   
      
   Well, there are some crimes that BTR1701 is indirectly responsible   
   for .... but Ving Rhames dogs ain't one of them.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)