XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.punk, alt.pets.rodents
XPost: rec.pets.cats.misc
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:24:20 GMT, Dutch wrote:
>dh@. wrote:
>> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:19:51 GMT, Dutch wrote:
>
>[..]
>
>>>>>> The meat industry provides life for the animals that it
>>>>>> slaughters,
>>>>> No it doesn't.
>>>> Obviously it provides billions of lives for various types
>>>> of animals.
>>> No it doesn't, it provides NO life for anything. It systematically
>>> arranges animal breeding to serve it's purposes.
>>>
>>>>> No human endeavor "provides life", humans and their
>>>>> "industries" control the breeding and deaths of animals so they become
>>>>> consumer products. Only nature, or God if you like, "provides life".
>>>>>
>>>>> You're trying to play God, claiming a credit for life itself,
>>>> Only a very stupid person would think about it like that.
>>>> People with better ability to understand realise that the
>>>> meat industry provides life for billions of animals.
>>> Nope, no industry ever "provided" a single life, they only arrange
>>> births and deaths to provide a consumer product
>>
>> You poor stupid fool. The consumer product comes from
>> the life necessarily provided as you just stated. You are such
>> a slow, shallow little fool.
>
>No industry, no human, has ever "provided life" for any animal. Humans
>herd animals into barns and orchestrate breeding, feeding and slaughter
>to provide "products", not life.
You really are proving to be MUCH too stupid to discuss
things like this, Booger. You are always confused, wandering
in a bewildered fog between your own ears. The product
provided is meat. The meat does not occur without animals
being provided with life THROUGH BREEDING, resulting
in the animals who actually ARE the product. You don't
understand the difference between providing life through
breeding, and the concept of producing life from lifeless
materials.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
