9e817156
XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, misc.rural, alt.agriculture
XPost: rec.pets.cats.community
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:34:44 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:
>On Mar 30, 9:25 am, dh@. wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:47:04 -0700, Goo wrote:
>> >On 3/29/2011 12:22 PM, Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>> >> On Mar 29, 12:16 pm, Goo wrote:
>> >>> From the USDA
>>
>> >>> Animal Agriculture - 1980-2020
>>
>> >>> Chicken Growth Domestic demand for chicken has increased dramatically
>> >>> since the beginning of the broiler industry. Cost reduction, product
>> >>> innovation, and healthy image have set a pace to take chicken to first
>> >>> place among the meats (boneless weight) in the U.S. diet by 2010. Total
>> >>> production has increased at a greater rate than consumption because of
>> >>> increased exports and a shift in tonnage of the least desired parts to
>> >>> pet food and rendering.
>>
>> >>> Got it, Fuckwit and Douchebag? The number of chickens produced has
>> >>> increased due in part to demand for chicken in pet food.
>>
>> >>> You lose.
>>
>> >> INCREASED EXPORTS,........LEAST DESIRED PARTS TO PET FOOD.
>>
>> >"Total production has increased at a greater rate than consumption" -
>> >more chickens were produced *both* because of greater exports *AND*
>> >demand for chicken in pet food.
>>
>> >The demand for pet food causes more animals to be produced: proved.
>>
>> That doesn't mean that any chickens are raised to be pet food for one
thing
>> Goob, and for another it doesn't do a thing to back up your pet food cattle
>> idea. They said, "a shift in tonnage of the least desired parts". It sounds
>> like, Goo, they are now sending more of the least desired parts to pet food
and
>> rendering instead of using them for human food, so they need more chickens
to
>> feed HUMANS Goober, not pets. Consumption has not increased, but the
percentage
>> of each bird that humans consume in general has been reduced for whatever
>> reason(s) so more chickens are needed for humans. Humans are eating less of
the
>> "least desired parts" so more chickens have to be born to provide more of
the
>> desirable parts, regardless of whether the parts they are no longer eating
get
>> feed to pets, rendered, or cooked up for the homeless.
>
>
>
>LOL!! Poor stupid Goobs. He set a trap then stepped into it himself.
>Now he's gnawing his own leg off to get free.
I don't believe Goo's at the point of knowing his own position yet. This
Goober STILL thinks that cows are raised just to be pet food, and now he thinks
chickens are too. It may be another period of years again before Goo figures
out
how stupid he's being right now...IF he ever does figure it out at all.
What must the Goober think? He believes some chickens are raised
specifically to be pet food but can't say for how long, so let's say for Goo
that it's 6-8 weeks and if he wants to say it's longer or shorter that's up to
Goo. Does Goo believe that entire chicken houses are filled with birds being
raised only to become pet food? Or does Goo think that maybe a portion of many
houses contain birds that will become pet food? Let's say for Goo since he
won't/can't say for himself, that he believes entire houses are filled with pet
food chickens since he believed entire herds of cattle were raised for pet food
and most likely he still does. So, we can conclude that the Goober believes
there are entire chicken houses filled with chickens which he thinks will be
raised for 6-8 weeks only to become pet food, with each entire bird being used
only for pet food. LOL!!! It's incredibly stupid, but that's what Goo must
believe. Either that or he must think that what we consider the prime parts of
the pet food chickens are regarded as "less desirable" parts in the pet food
industry, and so are sold as by-products to the human market. LOL!!! Either
way,
WHAT A GOOBER!
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
