ca2c820c
XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.agriculture, sci.agriculture
XPost: alt.cats
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 17:38:11 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote:
>On Apr 28, 7:03 pm, dh@. wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 23:28:11 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Apr 26, 2:31 pm, Goo wrote:
>> >> Fuckwit David Harrison, convicted criminal breeder of fighting birds,
lied:
>>
>> >> > On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 12:38:38 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>
>> >> >> Fuckwit David Harrison, convicted criminal breeder of fighting birds,
lied:
>>
>> >> >>> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 19:40:40 -0700 (PDT), Ron Douchebag Hamilton
stuck his fist up his own ass:
>>
>> >> >>>> [Douchebag's losing effort]
>>
>> >> >>> [Fuckwit' losing effort]
>>
>> >> >> Some livestock animals are destined to become pet food.
>>
>> >> > None are raised specifically to become pet food
>>
>> >> Prove it.
>>
>> >LOL!!!
>>
>> >You're the one who kept affirming that they are so YOU prove animals
>> >are specifically raised to be pet food.
>>
>> The Goober and his boys kept on trying to do that for several years and
>> between The Three Goos, the "best" they could come up with was one example
of a
>> farm that didn't even raise enough cattle to feed 100 of their own dogs.-
>
>
>Poor Goobs is trying to work that one example which I find
>questionable into proof that an entire industry of animals raised for
>pet food exists.
>
>If that industry exists as Goo claims he should have no trouble
>telling us where the choice cuts wind up.
It's beginning to appear Goo has finally learned that no additional
livestock need to be raised in order to feed pets, as he used to stupidly
insist
they did.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
