Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.pets.dogs.misc    |    All other topics, chat, humor, etc    |    8,070 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 7,996 of 8,070    |
|    dh@. to All    |
|    Re: Are some livestock raised only for p    |
|    09 May 11 17:33:14    |
      XPost: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.agriculture, sci.agriculture       XPost: alt.cats              On Sun, 08 May 2011 15:07:32 -0700, Goo lied:              >On Sun, 08 May 2011 16:08:27 -0700, dh@. wrote:       >       >>On Thu, 05 May 2011 13:33:02 -0700, Goo lied blatantly:       >>       >>>On Thu, 05 May 2011 16:02:04 -0700, dh@. wrote:       >>>       >>>>On Wed, 04 May 2011 13:29:07 -0700, Goo wrote:       >>>>       >>>>>On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:52:58 -0700, dh@. wrote:       >>>>>       >>>>>>On Tue, 03 May 2011 10:52:26 -0700, Goo lied:       >>>>>>       >>>>>>>You are not promoting animal welfare       >>>>>>       >>>>>>Goober I encourage people to appreciate when AW is successful, and you       oppose       >>>>>>having appreciation and have manically been opposing it for over a decade       >>>>>>because and only because having appreciation works against elimination.       Did you       >>>>>>somehow forget about that all of a sudden, Goob?       >>>>>       >>>>>No.       >>>>       >>>> Then it should be clear to you that I encourage decent AW and you       argue in       >>>>favor of elimination instead, and part of the way you do that is by       maniacally       >>>>opposing appreciation for AW successfully providing lives of positive       value for       >>>>millions of livestock animals.       >>>       >>>You do not encourage better animal welfare.       >>       >> I have been encouraging appreciation for when it is successful, and you       have       >>been opposing appreciation for when it is successful, for over a decade       Goober.       >       >No.               That's exactly what has been going on Goo, and we both know it.              >You have been trying to coerce people into wanting livestock to exist.               I point out that decent AW provides millions of them with lives of positive       value for people who are able to appreciate when AW is successful Goob, and you       try to prevent people from appreciating when AW is successful.       _________________________________________________________       "Life "justifying" death is the stupidest goddamned thing       you ever wrote." - Goo              "NO livestock benefit from being farmed." - Goo              "No farm animals benefit from farming." - Goo              "There is nothing to "appreciate" about the livestock "getting       to experience life" - Goo              "Shut the fuck up about "consideration" for "their lives"" - Goo              "the "getting to experience life" deserves NO moral       consideration, and is given none; the deliberate killing       of animals for use by humans DOES deserve moral       consideration, and gets it." - Goo              ""giving them life" does NOT mitigate the wrongness of       their deaths" - Goo              "Causing animals to be born and "get to experience life"       (in Fuckwit's wretched prose) is no mitigation at all for       killing them." - Goo              "When considering your food choices ethically, assign       ZERO weight to the morally empty fact that choosing to       eat meat causes animals to be bred into existence." - Goo              "The meaningless fact-lette that farm animals "get to       experience life" deserves no consideration when asking       whether or not it is moral to kill them. Zero." - Goo              "no matter how "decent" the conditions are, the deliberate killing       of the animals erases all of it." - Goo              "the moral harm caused by killing them is greater in magnitude       than ANY benefit they might derive from "decent lives" - Goo              "The opportunity for potential livestock to "get to       experience life" deserves *NO* moral consideration       whatever, and certainly cannot be used to justify the       breeding of livestock" - Goo              "The meaningless fact-lette that farm animals "get       to experience life" deserves no consideration when       asking whether or not it is moral to kill them. Zero." - Goo              "It is completely UNIMPORTANT, morally, that "billions       of animals" at any point "get to experience life."       ZERO importance to it." - Goo              "There is no "selfishness" involved in wanting farm animals not to       exist as a step towards creating a more just world." - Goo       ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca