Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.sport.football.college    |    US-style college football    |    209,580 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 208,671 of 209,580    |
|    Michael Falkner to The NOTBCS Guy    |
|    Re: [Michigan] Would the CFP Committee t    |
|    11 Nov 23 15:09:46    |
      From: darkstar7646@gmail.com              On Saturday, November 11, 2023 at 12:24:51 PM UTC-8, The NOTBCS Guy wrote:       > I am pretty sure the committee has already said, "No, we won't - it's the       Big Ten's and the NCAA's problem, not ours."               The Big Ten is a signatory. They're part of this process.              The one reason I may be forced to agree with you is the Ohio State tattoo       scandal, and that the games weren't changed as a result. (Michigan State       would've gone to the Rose instead of Wisconsin that year, Wisconsin probably       then replaces Ohio State in        the Sugar.)              > The only ways I can see the CFP getting involved is if either:        > (a) Michigan is hit with a postseason ban just before the playoffs, in which       case, the CFP has to scramble to find a replacement (which is one reason I       don't see this happening in the first place), or               No, you just put #5 in. Then it's highest seed vs. 5 and the other two. You       just take Michigan out of the situation. Not difficult at all.              > (b) Michigan wins the CFP championship but, for some reason, has to vacate       the championship game win, in which case, the CFP could strip Michigan of its       championship. Note that, going by a strict reading of the NCAA Bylaws, the CFP       cannot demand that        the players give back their championship rings, since, technically, the CFP       wasn't authorized to give them out in the first place (one of the problems of       the championship game technically not being a "bowl game"). In theory, it       could demand that Michigan        give back the trophy, under penalty of not being eligible to be ranked (in       other words, a de facto indefinite playoff ban) until it does.              I think, if we get that far, they won't have to worry -- they will be banned       for quite a while. I could easily see the entire Harbaugh Era wiped and a       long bowl ban.              This is one of the reasons I thought the refs might step in today (easier       today than in two weeks at the Big House).              At this point, Michigan's theory is the Stalker's Paradox: "If I can't have       it, no one will."              Mike              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca