From: don.p.del.grande@gmail.com   
      
   > > I am in the minority on this, but I don't see Michigan vacat   
   ng/forfeiting/whatever the word is this week any games - that's pretty much   
   reserved for using ineligible players. The NCAA should take its time on this,   
   so it can find out (a) who exactly    
   knew what, and (b) who's willing to cooperate.   
   > That's the problem -- this is a case where you COULD and SHOULD punish the   
   current athletes.   
      
   I seriously doubt this investigation will be over before the CFP championship   
   game, in which case, vacating wins won't have any effect on the players. It's   
   not as if the NCAA can say, "Give back any championship rings you received or   
   you lose all    
   remaining eligibility, immediately.   
      
   > > Besides, even if the NCAA were to suspend Harbaugh - and it wouldn't be   
   indefinitely - it would probably be less than the length of the NFL coaching   
   contract he would sign.   
   > Which is why it needs to be an outright ban -- not a show-cause.    
      
   A show-cause is not the same as a suspension. In fact, quite a few show-causes   
   include requirements that if the coach is hired, he has to be suspended for a   
   certain number of games.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)