Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.sport.football.college    |    US-style college football    |    209,580 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 209,069 of 209,580    |
|    michael anderson to JGibson    |
|    Re: Florida State 1993    |
|    09 Dec 23 16:08:57    |
      From: mianderson79@gmail.com              On Wednesday, December 6, 2023 at 10:51:40 AM UTC-6, JGibson wrote:       > Forget the fact that they lost to Notre Dame during the season but ended up       ranked ahead of Notre Dame for the national title at the end. Why did they get       chosen for the Orange Bowl against Nebraska (where FSU was an 18.5 point       favorite but barely won)        when both Nebraska and West Virginia (who won the conference that included       both Miami and Notre Dame-beater Boston College) were undefeated?              Look, I don't agree with the decision to not take FSU this year. but 1993(and       the underlying thought process and reasons for the decision)       and this year's decision are entirely compatible and logically consistent.              In 1993 due to the overall body of work of FSU(compared to ND and WVU) the       decision was made to put them in that game and then vote them #1 based on       that(and the vote wasn't even close, nor should it have been). They felt       those things overshadowed the 1        loss.              In 2023 the committee focused mostly on eye test without their qb and then       secondarily overall body of work(best win LSU probably vs an alabama best win       that is.....well as humongous as it gets) to keep FSU out(and put bama and       texas in). They felt those        things, like in 1993, overshadowed the loss difference.              Also I was old enough to remember 1993 well. That was *not* controversial at       all at the time and there was very little debate. Everyone acknowledged that       ND won the hth in a close game in south bend(and yes it was a close game at       the end.....perhaps if        ND had played the 4th qtr like they did the first 3 it wouldnt have been a       close game and they may have garnered more consideration), but the       *overwhelming* advantage FSU had over ND across the board when looking at the       rest of the schedule and results        more than made up for that.               note that I do believe HTH has value and in many cases should be a deciding       factor, but certainly not in 93 when I didn't think the resumes were very       similar. And the voters overwhelmingly felt that way too.               As for WVU.....lol.....I mean c'mon, anyone who watched 30 seconds of what SS       did to them boys from morgantown knows WVU never should have been near a       national title game.               --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca