Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.sport.football.college    |    US-style college football    |    209,580 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 209,274 of 209,580    |
|    The NOTBCS Guy to All    |
|    Re: NBC can stick their Peacock where th    |
|    11 Jan 24 08:57:37    |
      From: don.p.del.grande@gmail.com              > NBC is gambling their $110 million investment to get a playoff game to be        > shown exclusively on their streaming service is going to payoff       spectacularly        > in new subscriptions. I hope they fail spectacularly. I'm a Chiefs fan but       I'm        > not going to pony up. Instead, I will record the game when it is replayed on       the        > NFL Network overnight. I'll watch it Sunday morning. I'll just have to stay       off        > the internet so I don't accidentally learn how the game turned out.               Somehow, I don't think having one wild card playoff game on Peacock is going       to result in that many new subscriptions. I have a feeling the real reason NBC       Universal is doing this is to gauge whether or not it would be worth it to air       some regular season        games as Peacock exclusives, the way Amazon Prime does.               > If NBC succeeds in getting a lot of new Peacock subscribers, we can count        > on more and more playoff games only being available on streamed subscription        > services. Maybe someday even the Super Bowl will be pay-per-view. Maybe        > the CFP playoffs will only be available on pay TV.               Except for the Super Bowl and maybe the CFP Championship, I would say, "You       can pretty much count on that happening already."       There would be too much backlash if the Super Bowl ended up PPV - especially       if the halftime show was PPV as well.       I can also hear all of the NBC affiliates screaming at 30 Rock right now if       NBC even thinks about airing the Super Bowl only on Peacock. The same applies       to West 57th Street and Paramount+, or wherever ABC is located nowadays and       any of Disney+ / Hulu /        ESPN+. At least Fox doesn't have any partner streaming service; remember, the       Fox network had to be left out of the Disney buyout as the FCC would not allow       Disney to own both the Fox and ABC networks.              What I can see happening is, if, say, Amazon Prime or Apple TV has the game,       it would air it for free - but with the usual expensive ads. The problem now       is, getting access to the network; unless your "smart TV" already has the       network, you need to run        out and buy something like a Roku box or Amazon Fire stick. Now there's       something I can see - Amazon airing the game for free, but on a dedicated       Super Bowl channel that can be accessed only on Amazon Fire.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca