Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.sport.football.college    |    US-style college football    |    209,581 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 209,279 of 209,581    |
|    Michael Falkner to The NOTBCS Guy    |
|    Re: NBC can stick their Peacock where th    |
|    11 Jan 24 11:21:20    |
      From: darkstar7646@gmail.com              On Thursday, January 11, 2024 at 8:57:40 AM UTC-8, The NOTBCS Guy wrote:              > Somehow, I don't think having one wild card playoff game on Peacock is going       to result in that many new subscriptions. I have a feeling the real reason NBC       Universal is doing this is to gauge whether or not it would be worth it to air       some regular        season games as Peacock exclusives, the way Amazon Prime does.              Exactly.              You're probably staring into the teeth of a dual-exclusive deal -- half the       season on Peacock, half on Amazon Prime.              The problem in the way is that most of the pro teams are utter shit, and you       can't even get Al Michaels to give a fuck about the games, and you're hearing       it -- from both him and future FOX guru Tom Brady.              > Except for the Super Bowl and maybe the CFP Championship, I would say, "You       can pretty much count on that happening already."               The only reason Monday Night Football isn't pay-TV is because of the actor and       writer strikes.              > There would be too much backlash if the Super Bowl ended up PPV - especially       if the halftime show was PPV as well.               Oh, Hell. I see worse.              The game is six hours long and each quarter has a concert between them. All       on PPV.              > I can also hear all of the NBC affiliates screaming at 30 Rock right now if       NBC even thinks about airing the Super Bowl only on Peacock. The same applies       to West 57th Street and Paramount+, or wherever ABC is located nowadays and       any of Disney+ / Hulu /        ESPN+. At least Fox doesn't have any partner streaming service; remember, the       Fox network had to be left out of the Disney buyout as the FCC would not allow       Disney to own both the Fox and ABC networks.               NBC is already basically on life support as it is.               > What I can see happening is, if, say, Amazon Prime or Apple TV has the game,       it would air it for free - but with the usual expensive ads. The problem now       is, getting access to the network; unless your "smart TV" already has the       network, you need to run        out and buy something like a Roku box or Amazon Fire stick. Now there's       something I can see - Amazon airing the game for free, but on a dedicated       Super Bowl channel that can be accessed only on Amazon Fire.              They'd have to do something they aren't doing for Thursday Night -- remove the       Twitch option.              Mike              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca