Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.sport.football.college    |    US-style college football    |    209,581 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 209,282 of 209,581    |
|    JE Corbett to Michael Falkner    |
|    Re: NBC can stick their Peacock where th    |
|    11 Jan 24 14:49:25    |
      From: jecorbett4@gmail.com              On Thursday, January 11, 2024 at 2:21:22 PM UTC-5, Michael Falkner wrote:       > On Thursday, January 11, 2024 at 8:57:40 AM UTC-8, The NOTBCS Guy wrote:        >        > > Somehow, I don't think having one wild card playoff game on Peacock is       going to result in that many new subscriptions. I have a feeling the real       reason NBC Universal is doing this is to gauge whether or not it would be       worth it to air some regular        season games as Peacock exclusives, the way Amazon Prime does.       > Exactly.        >        > You're probably staring into the teeth of a dual-exclusive deal -- half the       season on Peacock, half on Amazon Prime.        >        > The problem in the way is that most of the pro teams are utter shit, and you       can't even get Al Michaels to give a fuck about the games, and you're hearing       it -- from both him and future FOX guru Tom Brady.       > > Except for the Super Bowl and maybe the CFP Championship, I would say,       "You can pretty much count on that happening already."       > The only reason Monday Night Football isn't pay-TV is because of the actor       and writer strikes.       > > There would be too much backlash if the Super Bowl ended up PPV -       especially if the halftime show was PPV as well.       > Oh, Hell. I see worse.        >        > The game is six hours long and each quarter has a concert between them. All       on PPV.              I've never understood the attraction of the halftime shows. Mostly       past-their-prime music acts doing a few numbers. BFD.       Whether or not I have rooting interest in teams playing, I usually get pumped       up during the game and I spend halftime away        from the TV decompressing. I'll check my email or do something else on my       laptop.              > > I can also hear all of the NBC affiliates screaming at 30 Rock right now       if NBC even thinks about airing the Super Bowl only on Peacock. The same       applies to West 57th Street and Paramount+, or wherever ABC is located       nowadays and any of Disney+ /        Hulu / ESPN+. At least Fox doesn't have any partner streaming service;       remember, the Fox network had to be left out of the Disney buyout as the FCC       would not allow Disney to own both the Fox and ABC networks.       > NBC is already basically on life support as it is.              All the networks are just shells of what they were a generation ago. There's       so much more and better content on cable. The       only thing I watch regularly on the networks is sports. I've never been into       reality TV. Never have watched an episode of shows       like Survivor, Amazing Race, Big Brother, etc. The talent contests are just       glitzier versions of the old Original Amateur Hour.        I know I'm an old fart but I don't find any of the current sit-coms to be       funny and have never gotten hooked on any of the        recent dramas. The last one I watched regularly was The West Wing which is       ironic because I'm a conservative.               > > What I can see happening is, if, say, Amazon Prime or Apple TV has the       game, it would air it for free - but with the usual expensive ads. The problem       now is, getting access to the network; unless your "smart TV" already has the       network, you need to        run out and buy something like a Roku box or Amazon Fire stick. Now there's       something I can see - Amazon airing the game for free, but on a dedicated       Super Bowl channel that can be accessed only on Amazon Fire.       > They'd have to do something they aren't doing for Thursday Night -- remove       the Twitch option.        >        Amazon has ruined Thursday night football for me. My slow internet connection       half the time can't connect and when it does,       I can't get the game on high-def so the picture quality is poor and there is       constant buffering. If I am able to watch the game to completion, it usually       finishes about a half hour after the actual game did. Most of the Thursday       night games have been        crap and if there is a good one, I'll record the NFL Network overnight replay       and watch it Friday morning. That hasn't happened       often.              The NFL Sunday Ticket is another thing I've lost. I don't have the       connectivity issue I have with Amazon Prime but I can't        watch those games in high def either. Another issue I've had is I get a lot       more games blacked out than I did when DirecTV       had the contract. I live a little northeast of Columbus, OH but I couldn't       watch the Kansas CIty at Denver game even though       it wasn't on any of the Columbus stations. I'm guessing it might have been on       a Pittsburgh or Wheeling station and they        considered me to be in their local market. With DirecTV, I would sometimes       have Steelers games blacked out even though       they weren't on the Columbus stations. I subscribed this past year but I'm not       going to re-up. Just not worth it.               I know we are going to see more and more content moved to subscriber services,       not just sports. As a consumer I have the       right to say no and I expect I will be exercising that right frequently. There       will be a lot of games I don't get to see but that       used to be the way it was. You got to watch only what your local stations       offered. I'm wondering if in the future, the local        stations are even going to have access to the big events.                       --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca