XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv, alt.tv.babylon-5   
   From: fn62@dial.pipex.com   
      
    wrote in message   
   news:1159923684.301705.231300@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...   
      
   > What they're saying is that the "Terms of the Contract" are unfair   
   > compensation for the work.  If a contract is offered to Donald Trump   
   > for a public speaking gig in which he wouldn't be covered for flight   
   > expenses and he'd only receive $1, the terms of the contract would be   
   > extremely inadequate in terms of his fair market price.  Thus it would   
   > not be "fair" compensation, or in other words it would be "unfair".   
   > It's a matter of semantics, the contract would be "legal" as such, but   
   > certainly not a fair market agreement.   
   >   
      
   Major difference between your side of the pond and ours here; in the UK and   
   Europe, an unfair contract is also illegal.   
      
   Ali   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)