XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv, alt.fan.tom-servo   
   From: heck@toodamnmuchspambutreallycomputer.org   
      
   "3cjmd@comcast.net (Jaime M. de Castellvi)"  draws inspiration from a   
   reality most only suspect:   
   >On Fri, 07 May 2004 08:22:00 -0400, Heck   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>"3cjmd@comcast.net (Jaime M. de Castellvi)"  draws inspiration from a   
   >>reality most only suspect:   
   >>>On Fri, 07 May 2004 03:40:34 GMT, "David E. Powell"   
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>"jayembee"  wrote in message   
   >>>>news:g4eo805d595qs7pqs14ri9fvaia7926nb8@4ax.com...   
   >>>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 15:59:19 GMT, 3cjmd@comcast.net (Jaime M. de   
   >>>>> Castellvi) wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> >You know, watching the whole last season over again, it isn't quite as   
   >>>>> >bad as it'd seemed back then.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Funny. That was my reaction, too.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> >Yeah, the whole Byron arc things sucks pickled eggs   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It wouldn't be so bad if Byron himself wasn't such a drip.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> >and I'm not terribly fond of "A View from the Gallery" either (pity,   
   >>>>though,   
   >>>>> >because the concept had so much more potential),   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> What? That's one of my three favorite episodes from the season, and   
   >>>>> always has been. Mac and Bo rule!   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> (My other two S5 favorites are "The Day of the Dead" and "The Corps Is   
   >>>>> Mother, the Corps Is Father".)   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> >As an afterthought, in that ep where Garibaldi and his wife take their   
   >>>>> >leave from Sheridan and Delenn (was it "Objects in Motion"?), after   
   >>>>> >that awkward moment when John and Michael first shake hands and then   
   >>>>> >finally hug, did I see Sheridan trying to hide the woodie he was   
   >>>>> >nursing, afterwards?  I think I'm finally beginning to understand why   
   >>>>> >Franklin relished the show so much...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You're sick.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Keep it up.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>The woody?   
   >>>   
   >>>It's been over 12 days, David.  Even I don't have that much enduring   
   >>>power.  But thank you for your interest all the same.   
   >>>   
   >>You are saaying your Rumsfeld is staying in your cabinet??   
   >   
   >My so-called Rumsfeld (so-called when it stands ever proudly at   
   >attention fulfilling its duty, undaunted by the limelight or the   
   >bloody quagmires that ooze and drip out of Lots42's ass, or by any   
   >hint of malfeasance or fear if engulfment; shit simply doesn't stick   
   >to it) continues to have my support and confidence as my #1 right hand   
   >asset.   
   >   
   >Sometimes, when it is not at its finest moment, when it is feeling sad   
   >and blue and tries to pop up into the comfort of daylight for fear of   
   >being bitten by the wrong fangs, I may also refer to it playfully as   
   >my Huge Jackman.  Curiously enough, this moniker would also seem to   
   >apply to Tim Weaver, albeit for entirely different reasons.   
   >   
   >Your interest and support are ever appreciated so, Harold.   
   >   
      
   You're welcome.  You don't need *my* support.  Not the support of a gantry,   
   nor a trellis, nor suspension ropes, nor stanchions, nor cantilevers, but   
   just overinflated self-outthrusting protrusion, that's what you need.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)