From: paul@harper.net   
      
   On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 22:12:16 GMT, "tony_becky_mikey_verizon_news"   
    wrote:   
      
   >Paul,   
   >  A simple question here.. What is the purpose you propose to having as to   
   >why you need to go into the moderated newsgroup   
   >and attack JMS?   
      
   Your assumption that I am attacking JMS is misplaced. The remainder   
   falls at that first hurdle. If I was attacking JMS he *and everyone   
   else* would know it.   
      
   Pointing out some fallacies is not by any means an attack. Just   
   because so many acolytes decide to accept unquestioningly his   
   interpretation does not make it any the truer.   
      
   >Do you care to offer something helpful and possibly meaningful to the others   
   >in the group?  If you are there just to rant on about how bad JMS is and how   
   >you feel he is hack, or clown or whatever you limited thinking can offer,   
   >then why don't you just stay away from a place you are NOT wanted?  Is that   
   >such a bad idea, if you can't offer something constructive, then stay away,   
   >like others have suggested..   
      
   Did you actually *read* the group, or are you just another parroting   
   acolyte? Had you actually read the group, you would have seen the many   
   different conversation threads I was active in, and you would not feel   
   the need to ask such stupid questions as that because they would   
   already have been answered.   
      
   Since you are clearly without any clue as to what you are saying, I   
   shall conclude forthwith that you are merely trolling, and treat you   
   accordingly.   
      
   Paul.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)