XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv   
   From: ANIM8Rfsk@cox.net   
      
   In article <7627c2pl025bonu0ronclfe8doqsae9aac@4ax.com>,   
    shawn  wrote:   
      
   > On 23 Jul 2006 03:28:08 -0700, "Michael Grosberg"   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   > >   
   > >darius wrote:   
   > >> "Anthony Cerrato"  wrote in   
   > >> news:9v5wg.470$GS4.387@fe09.lga...   
   > >>   
   > >> > You'll love the climax and ending even more! Terrific   
   > >> > series! (I place it all time second only to Trek-DS9.) JMS   
   > >> > pulled off a miracle with this show considering all the   
   > >> > problems he had with TPTB/constant threats of cancellation,   
   > >> > and cast troubles. Great story played out on an epic   
   > >> > galactic background--one which can never be forgotten.   
   > >> > ...tonyC   
   > >> >   
   > >>   
   > >> I'm making my way through season 2.  Why did they change commander?  Was   
   > >> there a dispute with the actor or was it planned?  (no spoilers please)   
   > >   
   > >It wasn't planned but you have to admit Boxleitner is a better actor   
   > >than O'Hare is. O'Hare's acting was wooden and uninteresting. The   
   > >change was for the better.   
   >   
   > We will have to agree to disagree. O'Hare was playing a man with major   
   > issues that were preventing him from showing much emotion. Those   
   > issues were slowly being resolved and with an old friends help,   
   > Garibaldi, cracks were appearing in the hard shell. If the powers that   
   > be hadn't interfered you would have seen a much more open Sinclair by   
   > the end of year two or three.   
      
   I saw O'Hare on Law & Order, and he was just as wooden and uninteresting   
   as he was on B5.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)