From: paul@harper.net   
      
   On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:51:07 GMT, "tony_becky_mikey_verizon_news"   
    wrote:   
      
   >  Many words, but still no answer to the question.. It would seem that you   
   >CAN NOT answer the simple question.. If you have offered SO MUCH to the   
   >group, why is it then, that they wish to banish you?  To kick you out on   
   >your sorry ass?  Ohh yes, because you chose to the tact of " Pointing out   
   >some fallacies..." versus saying the truth your attacks went from   
   >professional and with merit, to just downright mean and personal attacks   
   >when you were asked to stop.. Heck the bylaws of the newsgroup even state   
   >what you did went beyond the bounds..   
   >   
   >I am asking you a simple question, and you dance around it like it will burn   
   >you..A shame, since you can't practice what you preach...   
      
   So many words. So little content. No change there then...   
      
   My answer to your simple question is a simple answer:   
      
   Do your own fucking research.   
      
   If you are too lazy, or too ignorant or both to actually do and have a   
   look for yourself, then you are beyond saving (and not worth it   
   anyway).   
      
   It's always sad when a potentially sentient being is happy to be led   
   around by a ring through their nose. More so when a significant   
   portion of a newsgroup is.   
      
   Ho hum   
      
   Paul.   
   --   
   . Bill Maher: "Tulips aren't flowers, they're gay onions"   
   . A .sig is all well and good, but it's no substitute for a personality   
   . Is there a moron carrot above?  Have you replied to it?  Are you sure?   
   . EMail: Unless invited to, don't; it's likely to be automatically deleted.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)