XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.movies.current-films   
   XPost: rec.arts.sf.written   
   From: ANIM8Rfsk@cox.net   
      
   In article <9mikc25nf96rrt0e9s31e9mq49k7v27hma@4ax.com>,   
    David Johnston  wrote:   
      
   > On 28 Jul 2006 06:05:55 -0700, "junior-kun"    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   > >I have no doubt that Marvel editorial is well intentioned, but in JMS's   
   > >case, I think your distinction is rather meaningless.  JMS's Spider-man   
   > >and Fantastic Four are probably at least 25% plotted by editorial.   
   > >He's basically stated that he considers his job to be to write stories   
   > >based on whatever criteria Marvel aks for.   
   > >   
   > >Sellout might not be the best term, since a sellout might be doing it   
   > >for the money or career opportunity, and neither situation applies to   
   > >JMS.  Throwing out your artistic standards because its fun to write   
   > >Spider-man seems somehow worse.   
   > >   
   >   
   > He didn't create Spider-Man and therefore is less invested.  I'm sure   
   > that when other writers worked on his creations he expected them to   
   > fit their stories into his show   
      
   Why?  He mercilessly retconned Spider-Man and destroyed characters.  He   
   thinks others should treat his stuff with respect when he's crapping on   
   other people's work?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)