From: anybody@anywhere-anytime.com   
      
   In article <4619e7be_4@news.chariot.net.au>, "Jack"   
    wrote:   
      
   > "Anybody"  wrote in message   
   > news:160320070900571559%anybody@anywhere-anytime.com...   
   > > In article <1173984937.457192.120620@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,   
   > > "Madman"  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On Mar 9, 7:28 pm, "Natas"  wrote:   
   > >> > Just wondering what other people out there thought was missing or what   
   > >> > they wanted to be seen or not see in ANY of the Star Wars movies,   
   > >> > basically what would you like to see, not see   
   > >> >   
   > >> > examples:   
   > >> > like a certain battle, planet, something   
   > >> > i would have like to seen when they met Anikin skywalker he was older   
   > >> > then 8.   
   > >> > i would have like to seen Coreilla (Solo's home world)   
   > >> > I would have liked to seen Darth vader kick more ass after he went bad   
   > >> > I would have liked to seen 9 chapter like i grew up believing there   
   > >> > was ( at least were i grew up it was the rumor)   
   > >> >   
   > >> > Natas   
   > >>   
   > >> Corellia would have been nice to see, but it didn't play a factor in   
   > >> the main story.   
   > >>   
   > >> I would have liked to have seen Luke's friends (Cammie and Biggs) from   
   > >> the novel while they were in Anchorhead. I just KNOW they filmed some   
   > >> scenes here.   
   > >   
   > > They're viewable in deleted scenes on the DVD (not sure which release)   
   > > and the "Behind the Magic" CD-ROM.   
   > >   
   > > They're also available on a website somewhere, but I don't have the   
   > > address on this computer.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >> I would have liked to have seen more of a bridge between when Vader   
   > >> had no knowledge of his son (while he was just about to shoot him   
   > >> down) to when his obsession started at finding him. This may have been   
   > >> addressed in Splinter in the Minds Eye, which i haven't read, but I   
   > >> felt this transition was too rushed in the movies.   
   > >>   
   > >> With the Extended Universe material out now, that has stories set 40   
   > >> years after ANH, I don't believe there's a chance for a third set of   
   > >> trilogies. Then again, I've been wrong before (circa 1983, when I   
   > >> thought there would be no more Star Wars movies).   
   > >   
   > > There is no "third set of trilogies" to be made. The movie Saga is   
   > > about Anakin Skywalker and ends at Episode VI with his death and   
   > > redemption. Many of the other side stories are continued in the EU   
   > > material.   
   >   
   > Quite a large portion is devoted to the life of his son Luke.   
   > Anakin takes a backseat in episodes 4,5 and 6.   
   >   
   > There is no reason what-so-ever that a third trilogy would have to include   
   > Anakin.   
      
   George Lucas has repeatedly said that the movie Saga *as a whole* is   
   the story of Anakin Skywalker. Anakin is dead and redeemed, the movie   
   Saga IS over with six episodes.   
      
   Even if there were this mythical third trilogy, why would George Lucas   
   bother - many of you fools simply whine and complain about everything   
   he does wrong.    :-\   
      
   If I was George Lucas I would have shut down the entire Star Wars   
   franchise after the all the complaining about Episode I and told you   
   all to bugger off.   
      
      
      
   > EU, PU!   
   >   
   > >   
   > > The originally rumoured third trilogy back in the 1980s was going to be   
   > > with Luke and his sister finding their father and defeating the Emperor   
   > > ... but George Lucas changed Luke's sister into Leia and Vader as their   
   > > father. The storyline for the third trilogy was therefore squashed and   
   > > altered into Episode V and especially Episode VI.   
   > >   
   > > There is of course more Star Wars coming with at least two TV shows as   
   > > a starting point. There is also plans to re-re-release all the movies   
   > > in 3D. If the TV shows are sucessful there will be more and possibly   
   > > other spin-off movies.   
   >   
   > I see you still trot out the same responses whenever someone mentions a   
   > third trilogy.   
   >   
   > You don't know what he or anyone else associated with the franchise has in   
   > store, apart from what can easily be found on the official website.   
      
   Again, George Lucas has said repeatedly that there is NO "third   
   trilogy", there is no need for a third trilogy in the movie Saga's   
   story and there will be NO more episodes in the movie Saga.   
      
   What happens with the franchise as a whole is a completely different   
   question - there are already TV shows coming and there may well be   
   other SPIN-OFF movies, but they will not be episodes of the movie Saga.   
   They'll simply be movies set in the Star wars universe, just like the   
   Ewok movies are.   
      
      
      
   > So stop spouting off like you're some "expert authourity" on the subject.   
   >   
   > Who appointed you as Lucasfilm spokesman?   
      
   I'm simply telling you the FACTS as we know them. It's your problem if   
   you don't like those facts (maybe you should live in fantasyland with   
   morons like StupidShadow), but there's little you can do about it -   
   George Lucas is the one in charge of his franchise.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)