Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc    |    Miscellaneous topics pertaining to Star    |    25,718 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 23,969 of 25,718    |
|    peachy ashie passion to C'Pi    |
|    Re: STAR WARS PREQUEL - so the moral is     |
|    30 Jun 07 14:41:01    |
      XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.movies.past-films       From: exquisitepeach@hotmail.com              C'Pi wrote:              > peachy ashie passion wrote:       >       >>C'Pi wrote:       >>       >>       >>>peachy ashie passion wrote:       >>>       >>>       >>>>C'Pi wrote:       >>>>       >>>>       >>>>       >>>>>peachy ashie passion wrote:       >>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>>>C'Pi wrote:       >>>>>>       >>>>>>       >>>>>>       >>>>>>       >>>>>>>peachy ashie passion wrote:       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>C'Pi wrote:       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>Sorry. You can keep snarking rudely, but you got to promise       >>>>>>>>>you'll giggle every once in awhile. It helps me know you're       >>>>>>>>>human. C'Pi       >>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>I wouldn't want to lie to you that way.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>*sigh* Why oh why do I always have the soft spot for assholes?       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>>Must.........control.............typing.....       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>>C'Pi       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>       >>>>>> oh, nicely done. You had self restraint there.       >>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>>Question, Peachy. How come you give Merrick a free pass for       >>>>>slurring old people for having a smell he doesn't like? Is it       >>>>>because you know him better?       >>>>>       >>>>>C'Pi       >>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>       >>>> Nope. I never met either one of you before this thread.       >>>>       >>>> I expect it is because the ubiquitous nature of the gay slur, it's       >>>>left me oversensitized to it.       >>>       >>>       >>>Precisely the point. Being oversensitive to the word, you may take       >>>any use of the word as being negative. If in my case I was using it       >>>in a negative way you would have been able to point to some word or       >>>phrase that I used that established a negative context for the       >>>supposed slur. Something like in Gman's comments in the 80's tv       >>>Pilot thread where he established that he didn't like a certain kind       >>>of music, which made his "greengay" comment a slur. Or in the case       >>>of Merrick where he says "As long as you don't smell...it'll be all       >>>right" creating a negative context for the smell. So far you       >>>haven't been able to provide any context from what I said for the       >>>word having been used as a slur. In the end that just leaves you       >>>with the word itself being a slur. And that's too bad. Some words       >>>shouldn't be treated like that. Someday it shouldn't matter if you       >>>say a person is gay, even if they are not.       >>       >> That's crap weaseling darlin. Even if I like you, it's still crap       >>weaseling.       >>       >> It was the negative context that made his use a slur, it was the       >>negative context that made your use a slur.       >       >       > But once again I have to ask what the negative context was. As far as I can       > tell the only real negative thing I said about Palpatine was that he was a       > politician, cause that's always a negative thing.       >       >       >> If you didn't intend it, I'd have respected you for just saying       >>"wow, I didn't mean it that way. I don't like that use of the word       >>either"       >>       >> You didn't.       >>       >> You have continued to defend it. In fact, this is the first I've       >>actually seen you acknowledge that any use of the word might be a       >>slur - up to this point, you've just flat stuck to claiming the word       >>isn't a slur.       >       >       > As I've said, any word can be a slur, depending on how you say it. You're a       > towel!!       >       > The point isn't that a word can't be a slur, any word can be a slur, well       > almost any word, I doubt "pie" could be a slur, becuase pie is always good,       > but the point has been in that particular case I, and just me, didn't use       > "gay" as a slur.       >       > C'Pi       >       >               Since we've covered all that ground already, and I've elaborated on       my reasoning that any use of "gay" that is solely related to appearance       is a slur, I'm dropping it now.               You won't agree, and I just lose more respect for you every time you       open your mouth on the topic.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca