home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc      Miscellaneous topics pertaining to Star      25,718 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 23,969 of 25,718   
   peachy ashie passion to C'Pi   
   Re: STAR WARS PREQUEL - so the moral is    
   30 Jun 07 14:41:01   
   
   XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.movies.past-films   
   From: exquisitepeach@hotmail.com   
      
   C'Pi wrote:   
      
   > peachy ashie passion wrote:   
   >   
   >>C'Pi wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>peachy ashie passion wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>C'Pi wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>peachy ashie passion wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>C'Pi wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>peachy ashie passion wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>C'Pi wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Sorry.  You can keep snarking rudely, but you got to promise   
   >>>>>>>>>you'll giggle every once in awhile.  It helps me know you're   
   >>>>>>>>>human. C'Pi   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>I wouldn't want to lie to you that way.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>*sigh*  Why oh why do I always have the soft spot for assholes?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Must.........control.............typing.....   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>C'Pi   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   oh, nicely done.  You had self restraint there.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Question, Peachy.  How come you give Merrick a free pass for   
   >>>>>slurring old people for having a smell he doesn't like?  Is it   
   >>>>>because you know him better?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>C'Pi   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>  Nope.  I never met either one of you before this thread.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I expect it is because the ubiquitous nature of the gay slur, it's   
   >>>>left me oversensitized to it.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>Precisely the point.  Being oversensitive to the word, you may take   
   >>>any use of the word as being negative.  If in my case I was using it   
   >>>in a negative way you would have been able to point to some word or   
   >>>phrase that I used that established a negative context for the   
   >>>supposed slur.  Something like in Gman's comments in the 80's tv   
   >>>Pilot thread where he established that he didn't like a certain kind   
   >>>of music, which made his "greengay" comment a slur.  Or in the case   
   >>>of Merrick where he says "As long as you don't smell...it'll be all   
   >>>right" creating a negative context for the smell.  So far you   
   >>>haven't been able to provide any context from what I said for the   
   >>>word having been used as a slur.  In the end that just leaves you   
   >>>with the word itself being a slur.  And that's too bad.  Some words   
   >>>shouldn't be treated like that.  Someday it shouldn't matter if you   
   >>>say a person is gay, even if they are not.   
   >>   
   >>   That's crap weaseling darlin.  Even if I like you, it's still crap   
   >>weaseling.   
   >>   
   >>  It was the negative context that made his use a slur, it was the   
   >>negative context that made your use a slur.   
   >   
   >   
   > But once again I have to ask what the negative context was.  As far as I can   
   > tell the only real negative thing I said about Palpatine was that he was a   
   > politician, cause that's always a negative thing.   
   >   
   >   
   >>  If you didn't intend it, I'd have respected you for just saying   
   >>"wow, I didn't mean it that way.  I don't like that use of the word   
   >>either"   
   >>   
   >>  You didn't.   
   >>   
   >> You have continued to defend it.  In fact, this is the first I've   
   >>actually seen you acknowledge that any use of the word might be a   
   >>slur - up to this point, you've just flat stuck to claiming the word   
   >>isn't a slur.   
   >   
   >   
   > As I've said, any word can be a slur, depending on how you say it.  You're a   
   > towel!!   
   >   
   > The point isn't that a word can't be a slur, any word can be a slur, well   
   > almost any word, I doubt "pie" could be a slur, becuase pie is always good,   
   > but the point has been in that particular case I, and just me, didn't use   
   > "gay" as a slur.   
   >   
   > C'Pi   
   >   
   >   
      
       Since we've covered all that ground already, and I've elaborated on   
   my reasoning that any use of "gay" that is solely related to appearance   
   is a slur, I'm dropping it now.   
      
      You won't agree, and I just lose more respect for you every time you   
   open your mouth on the topic.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca