XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.movies.past-films   
   From: ANIM8Rfsk@cox.net   
      
   In article <9q2Ei.5011$J96.2976@trnddc02>,   
    peachy ashie passion  wrote:   
      
   > Anim8rFSK wrote:   
   >   
   > > In article ,   
   > >  peachy ashie passion  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >>Anim8rFSK wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >>   
   > >>>In article <5kaqn4F2si27U1@mid.individual.net>,   
   > >>> "Avoid normal situations."   
   > >>>  wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>>>In rec.arts.movies.past-films peachy ashie passion   
   > >>>> wrote:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>Merrick Baldelli wrote:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>>On 3 Sep 2007 02:15:27 GMT, "Avoid normal situations."   
   > >>>>>> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>You seem like a sharp guy. Why don't you come join us on   
   > >>>>>>>rec.arts.movies.   
   > >>>>>>>past-films? If you don't know where to start I'm sure many of us will   
   > >>>>>>>be   
   > >>>>>>>happy to recommend to you enough DVDs to last you well into 2009. :-)   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>	Because I make Mr. Cranky's reviews seem to be sickly sweet in   
   > >>>>>>their content?   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>	Because if you're truly a representative of r.a.m. and   
   > >>>>>>responding to something just over two months old is an indication of   
   > >>>>>>how you folk post there; it would interfere with my credo that   
   > >>>>>>"instantaneous gratification takes too long"?   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>	Because you're old news?   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>	The choices are just too endless to mention really.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Charming. First we get to read lengthy and egregiously tedious postings   
   > >>>>featuring you barking some fanboy right up a wall for calling Senator   
   > >>>>Palpatine a "gay politician"... then we endure descriptions from you of   
   > >>>>your   
   > >>>>unnatural sexual preferences that in any RL setting would warrant (dare I   
   > >>>>say   
   > >>>>it?) the bum's rush... then you smart off to the first person who   
   > >>>>addresses   
   > >>>>you civilly besides your Peachy Ashie Mousey Squealy companion.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Later days. VERY later.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> *plonk*   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>   But I can certainly see why he's trying to recruit more   
   > >>>>>entertainment to come to his group.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> *plonk*   
   > >>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>>Ooooo - he not only plonked Merrick, he DOUBLE DOG plonked him!   
   > >>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>   
   > >>     I think that was actually intended to be one at Merrick and one at me.   
   > >>   
   > >>   But it's funnier your way.   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > I wasn't sure -- he replied to you, but he mentioned you in the reply:   
   > >   
   > > < >   
   > >>>>you civilly besides your Peachy Ashie Mousey Squealy companion.>>   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > So I *think* he replied to you but was talking about you, to Merrick.   
   > >   
   > > Who can say?   
   > >   
   >   
   >     It wasn't the clearest reply ever.  Plus, I'm mousey and squealy?   
   > Go figure.  I was sort of shooting for vixenish.   
   >   
   >    I thought he addressed that line to Merrick, then dropped down to   
   > something I'd said and plonked it too, meaning each of us.  But clearly   
   > he was so vague, we are just making up our own interpretations here.   
      
   Ooo - interesting theory.  So are you each plonked, or are you unplonked   
   and Merrick doubly plonked?  Expiring minds want to know!   
      
   --   
   Why watch the Sci Fi Channel?   
   For every Flash Gordon, there is an Earthstorm!!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)