XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.movies.past-films   
   From: exquisitepeach@hotmail.com   
      
   Anim8rFSK wrote:   
      
   > In article ,   
   >  peachy ashie passion  wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   >>Anim8rFSK wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>In article <5kaqn4F2si27U1@mid.individual.net>,   
   >>> "Avoid normal situations."   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>In rec.arts.movies.past-films peachy ashie passion   
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>Merrick Baldelli wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>On 3 Sep 2007 02:15:27 GMT, "Avoid normal situations."   
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>You seem like a sharp guy. Why don't you come join us on   
   >>>>>>>rec.arts.movies.   
   >>>>>>>past-films? If you don't know where to start I'm sure many of us will be   
   >>>>>>>happy to recommend to you enough DVDs to last you well into 2009. :-)   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>	Because I make Mr. Cranky's reviews seem to be sickly sweet in   
   >>>>>>their content?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>	Because if you're truly a representative of r.a.m. and   
   >>>>>>responding to something just over two months old is an indication of   
   >>>>>>how you folk post there; it would interfere with my credo that   
   >>>>>>"instantaneous gratification takes too long"?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>	Because you're old news?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>	The choices are just too endless to mention really.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Charming. First we get to read lengthy and egregiously tedious postings   
   >>>>featuring you barking some fanboy right up a wall for calling Senator   
   >>>>Palpatine a "gay politician"... then we endure descriptions from you of   
   >>>>your   
   >>>>unnatural sexual preferences that in any RL setting would warrant (dare I   
   >>>>say   
   >>>>it?) the bum's rush... then you smart off to the first person who addresses   
   >>>>you civilly besides your Peachy Ashie Mousey Squealy companion.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Later days. VERY later.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> *plonk*   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   But I can certainly see why he's trying to recruit more   
   >>>>>entertainment to come to his group.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> *plonk*   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>Ooooo - he not only plonked Merrick, he DOUBLE DOG plonked him!   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>     I think that was actually intended to be one at Merrick and one at me.   
   >>   
   >>   But it's funnier your way.   
   >   
   >   
   > I wasn't sure -- he replied to you, but he mentioned you in the reply:   
   >   
   > <   
   >>>>you civilly besides your Peachy Ashie Mousey Squealy companion.>>   
   >   
   >   
   > So I *think* he replied to you but was talking about you, to Merrick.   
   >   
   > Who can say?   
   >   
      
       It wasn't the clearest reply ever.  Plus, I'm mousey and squealy?   
   Go figure.  I was sort of shooting for vixenish.   
      
      I thought he addressed that line to Merrick, then dropped down to   
   something I'd said and plonked it too, meaning each of us.  But clearly   
   he was so vague, we are just making up our own interpretations here.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)