XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.movies.past-films   
   From: exquisitepeach@hotmail.com   
      
   Merrick Baldelli wrote:   
      
   > On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 21:01:42 GMT, peachy ashie passion   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   >>Merrick Baldelli wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 02:13:14 GMT, peachy ashie passion   
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>>Merrick Baldelli wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 02:10:13 GMT, peachy ashie passion   
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> It wasn't the clearest reply ever.  Plus, I'm mousey and squealy?   
   >>>>>>Go figure.  I was sort of shooting for vixenish.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>	s'all right...  This one rode the short bus when he double   
   >>>>>plonked...  it's to be expected he couldn't get an accurate read.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>I thought he addressed that line to Merrick, then dropped down to   
   >>>>>>something I'd said and plonked it too, meaning each of us.  But clearly   
   >>>>>>he was so vague, we are just making up our own interpretations here.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>	No, you read it right.  That second plonk was definitely   
   >>>>>something you said and not something I said.  So it was a two-fer..   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Two-fer huh?   
   >>>>   Well, someone's kinky!   
   >>>   
   >>>	Wasn't thinking kink at the time; but given the definition on   
   >>>Urban-Dictionary, I guess it's Freudian.   
   >>   
   >>   Jeez, I didn't know about the urban dictionary thing.  I was just   
   >>being a smart ass.   
   >   
   >   
   > 	And apparently on the money.  Given that in New Englander   
   > Two-Fer merely means, "Two for one".   
   >   
      
      Oh.  Yeah.  THAT part I got.  :)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)