XPost: alt.fan.starwars, aus.sf   
   From: anybody@anywhere-anytime.com   
      
   In article <1194171285.371240.144630@v29g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,   
   Duggy wrote:   
      
   > On Nov 4, 12:37 pm, Anybody wrote:   
   > > We don't know at this stage, but they have only just started the   
   > > writing process, so it's going to be at least 2-3 years before they   
   > > turn up on any network. The animated show is due probably 2008 with the   
   > > live-action show in probably 2009/2010 at the earliest.   
   >   
   > > The filming of the live action show is being done in a similar method   
   > > to the Young Indiana Jones show (eg. multiple crews filming in   
   > > different locations) which makes it quicker. It's also being done   
   > > digitally, so that makes it easier and quicker to do any FX work.   
   >   
   > That's why YIJ had two casts... that doubles the speed, sure... which   
   > is half the speed you need.   
   >   
   > Or are you suggestion 4 casts for Star Wars?   
   >   
   > And isn't the multiple casts thing what killed Young Indy?   
      
   You're far too stuck on how a "normal" TV show is done. This isn't a   
   "normal" TV show - it's a George Lucas independant production, so none   
   of the "normal" rules and procedures apply. We simply don't know enough   
   yet about how the show will be broadcast (daily, weekly, etc.) or what   
   it is about.   
      
   There might be 4 crews, there might be 50 crews, who knows at this   
   point, but that was only one example of how Young Indy speeded up the   
   process and cut costs. Other ways include filming ALL the scenes (even   
   if in different episodes) needed at a particular location in one go so   
   that you don't have to keep going back there.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|