XPost: aus.sf, aus.tv, rec.arts.tv   
   From: nospam@yahoo.com   
      
   Anybody wrote:   
   > In article <472f446b$0$47109$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net>,   
   > "C'Pi"  wrote:   
   >   
   >> Duggy wrote:   
   >>> On Nov 5, 11:11 pm, "C'Pi"  wrote:   
   >>>> They also are more likely to be crap if the cast is entirely made   
   >>>> up of shit flinging monkeys.  Since it's all speculation in this   
   >>>> thread might as well give everything due consideration.   
   >>>   
   >>> Specualtion based on the information we have.   
   >>>   
   >>> I've seen nothing that says that Lucas is willing to work with   
   >>> monkeys again.   
   >>   
   >> All that "if...if...if" speculation isn't any better than the monkey   
   >> stuff. Hell, most of it's springing from the mind of Anybody, and   
   >> you're taking it to be worth more than monkey shit?   
   >   
   > One word: EXAMPLE.   :-\   
   >   
   > Good grief, why do I bother wasting my time trying to explain anything   
   > to the 2 year old monkeys infesting the Internet.   :-(   
      
   Your EXAMPLES are crap.  Even a 2 year old monkey can recognize that.   
      
   C'Pi   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)