From: anybody@anywhere-anytime.com   
      
   In article <130620081643145394%anybody@anywhere-anytime.com>, Anybody   
    wrote:   
      
   > In article <557354t8ksluk4j0pf5pjhkrj4i86qrpot@4ax.com>, Todd   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   > > I wrote:   
   > >   
   > > >> But that made sense. After delivering Han to Jabba, Fett checked his   
   > > >> legitimate accounts and found that his bounty for Luke had not been   
   > > >> deposited. Further researched revealed that Luke had escaped.   
   > >   
   > > Anybody wrote:   
   > >   
   > > >Bounty for Luke?!? You probably mean Han, unless that's something in   
   > > >the EU material.   
   > >   
   > > I doubt the bounty hunters gathered on the Executor because of any   
   > > loyalty to the Empire. They were there because they wanted to get   
   > > paid for capturing Luke. Hence, a bounty for Luke.   
   >   
   > There was no bounty for Luke as such. The bounty hunters were brought   
   > in to find Han and the Falcon, which Vader believed would then lead to   
   > Luke and the Rebels.   
   >   
   > From the RotJ script:   
   >   
   > VADER   
   > ... there will be a substantial reward for the one who   
   > finds the Millennium Falcon. You are free to use any   
   > methods necessary, but I want proof... no disintegrations.   
      
   D'oh!! That should have said "From TESB script". :-\   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|