XPost: rec.arts.movies.current-films, alt.fan.starwars   
   From: pilgaard@tele2adsl.dk.dk   
      
   anonymousNetUser  declared in:   
   rC5ok.20238$QX3.13608@newsfe02.iad :   
   > ??? wrote:   
   >> Lucasfilm has banned the two reviews from aintitcool.com.  In   
   >> opposition to this censorship, I have managed to dig them up again.   
   >> The first one is censored (not by me), the other is not:   
   >>   
   >   
   > It's because Lucas is a egomaniac and can't stand to have anyone   
   > criticize his work. Might cut into his next billion in license fees   
   > and movie profits.   
      
   Conspiracy theories are bad for your intellect.   
   Check elsewhere in the thread for a more truthful explanation.   
      
   > Funny how he said he wasn't going to make any more Star Wars movies   
   > after the first three.   
      
   He said that, AND he said he might do more later.   
      
   Or rather, we have people on record saying that Lucas has said the   
   former, and some saying that Lucas has said the latter.   
      
   > And then he did the second three, and said   
   > there were no more.   
      
   As in, live action movies from a different timeline setting.   
      
   > And now we're getting Star Wars cartoons.   
      
   Not live-action, and not in a new time setting.   
      
   > I can't believe a word the stupid fool says anymore.   
      
   Nor can we belive you anymore, for the obvious   
   slandering and misrepresenting quoting you do here.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)