3b28a31f
XPost: alt.fan.starwars
From: mr@sandman.net
In article
,
your.name@isp.com (Your Name) wrote:
> In article , "C'Pi"
> wrote:
>
> > Duggy wrote:
> > > On Nov 16, 5:56 pm, Sandman wrote:
> > >> In article <4ce1d50d$0$1612$742ec...@news.sonic.net>,
> > >>
> > >> sgor...@changethisparttohardbat.com wrote:
> > >>> In rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc Sandman wrote:
> > >>>> I can understand the kind of sheer work that would have to go into
> > >>>> restoring the originals and why he would focus on the versions he
> > >>>> actually prefers himself as a director.
> > >>
> > >>> This presumes that it would be expensive to do so. Heck, if he
> > >>> simply re-released the already-existing laserdisc masters (that
> > >>> were used for the 2006 bonus disk) with the anamorphic switch set
> > >>> to "on", a lot of people would be thrilled. That would cost
> > >>> absolutely nothing.
> > >>
> > >> I didn't know the laserdisc edition of Star Wars was digital 1080p
> > >> video.
> > >>
> > >> Laserdiscs had 425 lines resolution of analog video. I have a hard
> > >> time assuming that the supposed master for this low-resolution format
> > >> would be suited for a bluray release. And said master would also
> > >> probably still be analog, so the same thing applies.
> > >>
> > >> I read somewhere that the Bluray release will be the first
> > >> all-digital restoration of the original trilogy (SE, that is) and
> > >> that the DVD release was a mostly analog restoration and then
> > >> transfer to digital. I can't remember where I read it and I could be
> > >> mistaken, of course.
> > >
> > > Well there you go with your facts. Facts are just going to anny him.
> >
> > He's going to sprout red hair and start singing?
>
> Maybe Duggy meant Anny Skywalker, i.e. the whiney little brat. ;-)
Heck, just pick Any Skywalker.
--
Sandman[.net]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
