Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc    |    Miscellaneous topics pertaining to Star    |    25,718 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 24,720 of 25,718    |
|    Sandman to sgordon@changethisparttohardbat.com    |
|    Re: James Cameron    |
|    20 Nov 10 21:22:14    |
      From: mr@sandman.net              In article <4ce7f590$0$1598$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,        sgordon@changethisparttohardbat.com wrote:              > : And if you built your own house, you are free to re-build it as you       > : see fit, even if it's considered historical.       >       > Good point, at least for federal laws. State laws vary, and in many       > countries there are such restrictions (such as Italy).              Not really. Not only is it rare for a house to become historical while       its creator lives in and owns it (which is the only timeframe which is       interesting in this discussion), but the owner of a C-branded facility       can usually do pretty much with it. The most common limitation is the       facade and how it should be kept in style with the contemporary style       of the house. Meaning that you can restore/remodel even the facade       slightly if you so wish.                            --       Sandman[.net]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca