661b146c   
   XPost: rec.arts.drwho   
   From: yourname@yourisp.com   
      
   In article   
   , Duggy   
    wrote:   
      
   > On Dec 4, 8:31=A0am, yourn...@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:   
   > > > What's up with that?   
   >   
   > > Nobody has "proven me wrong".   
   >   
   > Tell me again how Harry Potter & the Deadly Hallows pt 2 (PG-13) is   
   > too scary for the intended audience but Revenge of the Sith (PG-13)   
   > isn't?   
      
   FACT: the franchises were aimed at different aged audiences. Star Wars is   
   slightly older than Harry Potter.   
      
   But since you won't believe that either, believe whatever utter garbage   
   that you want to delude yourself with.  :-\   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)