XPost: rec.arts.drwho   
   From: mr@sandman.net   
      
   In article   
   ,   
    yourname@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:   
      
   > In article   
   > , Duggy   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   > > On Dec 4, 8:31=A0am, yourn...@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:   
   > > > > What's up with that?   
   > >   
   > > > Nobody has "proven me wrong".   
   > >   
   > > Tell me again how Harry Potter & the Deadly Hallows pt 2 (PG-13) is   
   > > too scary for the intended audience but Revenge of the Sith (PG-13)   
   > > isn't?   
   >   
   > FACT: the franchises were aimed at different aged audiences. Star Wars is   
   > slightly older than Harry Potter.   
   >   
   > But since you won't believe that either, believe whatever utter garbage   
   > that you want to delude yourself with.  :-\   
      
   Facts without substantiations are just words.   
      
      
   --   
   Sandman[.net]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)