XPost: rec.arts.drwho   
   From: yourname@yourisp.com   
      
   In article , "Stephen Wilson"   
    wrote:   
      
   > "Sandman"  wrote in message   
   > news:mr-EE4453.08560605122011@News.Individual.NET...   
   > > In article   
   > > ,   
   > > yourname@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> In article   
   > >> , Duggy   
   > >>  wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >> > On Dec 4, 8:31=A0am, yourn...@yourisp.com (Your Name) wrote:   
   > >> > > > What's up with that?   
   > >> >   
   > >> > > Nobody has "proven me wrong".   
   > >> >   
   > >> > Tell me again how Harry Potter & the Deadly Hallows pt 2 (PG-13) is   
   > >> > too scary for the intended audience but Revenge of the Sith (PG-13)   
   > >> > isn't?   
   > >>   
   > >> FACT: the franchises were aimed at different aged audiences. Star Wars is   
   > >> slightly older than Harry Potter.   
   > >>   
   > >> But since you won't believe that either, believe whatever utter garbage   
   > >> that you want to delude yourself with.  :-\   
   > >   
   > > Facts without substantiations are just words.   
   >   
   > And words without substantiations are not facts.   
      
   Actually they can be.   
      
   It's not up to me to "prove" anything to morons since I realised a LONG   
   LONG LONG time ago that they will continue to believe whatever garbage   
   fills their tiny minds no matter how many ways I prove it, so I no longer   
   bother wasting my time trying. I simply give the facts ... whether ytou   
   fools want to believe them or not is your problem, I really couldn't care   
   less.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)