ca35366f   
   From: YourName@YourISP.com   
      
   In article   
   <6c9f13c4-7d6e-4e9e-b1c4-482c8658d11c@kg1g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>, Duggy   
    wrote:   
   > On Jan 26, 7:59=A0pm, Sandman  wrote:   
   > > In article   
   > > <59293033-c6d8-4a62-8b21-5f4e2c371...@o4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,   
   > > =A0Duggy  wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > OK, I get that.   
   > >   
   > > I don't.   
   > >   
   > > > But "Also in 2D"?   
   > >   
   > > Yeah, so basically they decided when they were making the 3D version   
   > > that they could digitally master it and remove one dimension, and also   
   > > release it in 2D. It's cool really, the image isn't as "deep" as the   
   > > 3D version, but it is brighter and more crisp. As a Star Wars fan, you   
   > > should obviously see both and compare to see which version you prefer   
   > > :)   
   >   
   > I get the whole 2D/3D thing for new films... but the point of the   
   > rerelease is to show it in 3D... why a new 2D release.   
   >   
   > Don't tell me He has made other changes too?   
      
   I did read that there have been some minor tweaks for both the Blu-ray   
   disc and 3D cinema releases, but if they're releasing the movie, why not   
   re-release it on 2D cinema screens as well?   
      
   There will be new kids who have never seen it on the big screen (2D   
   tickets are usually cheaper than 3D tickets) and there are people who   
   can't watch 3D movies (which might include me), but would like to see it   
   on the big screen again.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)