XPost: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From: epwise@yahoo.com
"Bast" wrote in news:kn8ud8$pmh$1@dont-
email.me:
>
>
> Your Name wrote:
>> In article
>> ,
>> RichA wrote:
>>> On May 18, 5:08=A0pm, Rob Cypher wrote:
>>>> This second "reboot" of his is bullshit. He's totally screwed with
>>>> all the characters' backstories, has them acting all
uncharacrstically
>>>> (aka tons of inapproriate emoting from supposedly logical Vulcans,
>>>> among other things) and has turned it into something that
>>>> resembles "The Bourne Legacy" along with the worst aspects of
>>>> "Starship Troopers".
>>>>
>>>> Don't laugh, Star Wars fans. He's coming to screw with your canon
>>>> next.
>>>>
>>>> If there's ever another ST movie, I hope they undo all the timeline
>>>> changes or just ignore them/treat them as an alternate universe.
>>>> Fuck that shit.
>>>
>>> He knows how to cater to the morons.
>>
>> JJ Abrams would do since he is a moron. :-(
>
>
>
>
> Have you noticed that even Mito and wiseguy aren't even trying to
defend
> this latest mess of a movie ?
>
> ....That its embarassing to them, it MUST be even worse than we say.
>
>
Why would I defend it? I haven't seen it and don't know when or if I
will.
I've never defended the first one. I have said it is real Star Trek
(because it is produced by Paramount) and have pointed out Your Name's
childish attitude toward anything he doesn't like but neither of those
defends the movie.
And lastly, I have just stated that I didn't really care for ANY of the
Star Trek movies. Overblown plots and special effects don't impress me.
I've seen most of them once and that was enough. I'd watch the animated
series over any of the movies.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
