7feb3f26   
   XPost: alt.tv.star-trek.tos   
   From: cigarmanwine@gmail.com   
      
   On May 21, 6:05 am, YourN...@YourISP.com (Your Name) wrote:   
   > In article , Sandman   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >  wrote:   
   > > In article   
   > > ,   
   > >  YourN...@YourISP.com (Your Name) wrote:   
   >   
   > > > > > > Even if he made it a musical of naked shaved wookies, it would   
   still   
   > > > > > > be better than the prequels.   
   >   
   > > > > > Lucas owned it and did what HE wanted. Sounds fair.   
   >   
   > > > > Of course. Never said anything about it being unfair. Ruined it was,   
   > > > > even so. :)   
   >   
   > > > George Lucas was allowed to do whatever he wanted ... he actually created   
   > > > the franchise.   
   >   
   > > Eh, yes I know? Why are you writing this? Have I claimed he either did   
   > > not create it or that he could not do whatever he wanted?   
   >   
   > > > Over-egoed "reboot" fools like JJ Abrams haven't got enough talent to   
   > > > actually make their own franchise, so they have to go around butchering   
   > > > other people's hard work instead.  :-(   
   >   
   > > Again - JJ Abrams could not butcher Star Wars even if he wanted. George   
   > > Lucas already did that. It's like shooting a dead horse expected it to   
   > > be more dead.   
   >   
   >    
   >   
   > Believe me, JJ Abrams can, and likely will. Everything else he   
   > (supposedly) makes is a disasterous mess, why would his version of "Star   
   > Wars" suddenly be something that actually fits and makes sense?   
      
   No. He has hands of GOLD as far as Hollywood is concerned. You may   
   not, from your basement vantage point, care for what he does but by   
   commercial and even critical standards Abrams is a success. You are   
   not.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)