789830bd   
   XPost: alt.tv.star-trek.tos   
   From: cigarmanwine@gmail.com   
      
   On May 21, 6:05 am, YourN...@YourISP.com (Your Name) wrote:   
   > In article , Sandman   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >  wrote:   
   > > In article   
   > > ,   
   > >  YourN...@YourISP.com (Your Name) wrote:   
   >   
   > > > > > > Even if he made it a musical of naked shaved wookies, it would   
   still   
   > > > > > > be better than the prequels.   
   >   
   > > > > > Lucas owned it and did what HE wanted. Sounds fair.   
   >   
   > > > > Of course. Never said anything about it being unfair. Ruined it was,   
   > > > > even so. :)   
   >   
   > > > George Lucas was allowed to do whatever he wanted ... he actually created   
   > > > the franchise.   
   >   
   > > Eh, yes I know? Why are you writing this? Have I claimed he either did   
   > > not create it or that he could not do whatever he wanted?   
   >   
   > > > Over-egoed "reboot" fools like JJ Abrams haven't got enough talent to   
   > > > actually make their own franchise, so they have to go around butchering   
   > > > other people's hard work instead.  :-(   
   >   
   > > Again - JJ Abrams could not butcher Star Wars even if he wanted. George   
   > > Lucas already did that. It's like shooting a dead horse expected it to   
   > > be more dead.   
   >   
   >    
   >   
   > Believe me, JJ Abrams can, and likely will. Everything else he   
   > (supposedly) makes is a disasterous mess, why would his version of "Star   
   > Wars" suddenly be something that actually fits and makes sense?   
      
   Why do you obsess over Abrams? What's he to you? He's just a guy   
   earning a living in a tough business. Why do you even give a fuck? If   
   you don't like his work just watch something else, like your extensive   
   library of POLICE ACADEMY director's cuts in HD 3D.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)