XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv   
   From: ahk@chinet.com   
      
   David Johnston  wrote:   
   >On 5/21/2013 6:03 AM, Merrick Baldelli wrote:   
   >>On Sun, 19 May 2013 07:38:54 -0700, anim8rFSK  wrote:   
      
   >>>>Sorry, won't happen.  Why?  Because Trek Fans are a   
   >>>>dysfunctional bunch.  Most of the ones that I've encountered will take   
   >>>>any and all shit shoveled to them on a plate and eat it.   
      
   >>>They're also amazingly defensive of material they aren't remotely   
   >>>familiar with.  The one extolling the virtues of Voyager and Enterprise   
   >>>clearly didn't actually watch it, or, at the very least, didn't pay   
   >>>attention.   
      
   >>Oh they did...  I was with them through both newsgroups and   
   >>were fucking flooding the threads with their hot lady spunk, either on   
   >>the fact that Janeway was a competent Captain or the T&A of 7 of 69 on   
   >>Voyager...  Or how "fresh" Enterprise was.   
      
   >>In the years that I had participated in those groups, it   
   >>rapidly became obvious that the mantra of these cows was "Bad Trek is   
   >>infinitely better than NO Trek".   
      
   >Hey if Trek fans didn't think that bad trek was better than no trek, TNG   
   >would never have survived into a second season.   
      
   Good point.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)