XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv   
   From: YourName@YourISP.com   
      
   In article , Merrick Baldelli   
    wrote:   
   > On Sun, 19 May 2013 07:38:54 -0700, anim8rFSK    
   > wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >>      Sorry, won't happen.  Why?  Because Trek Fans are a   
   > >> dysfunctional bunch.  Most of the ones that I've encountered will take   
   > >> any and all shit shoveled to them on a plate and eat it.   
   > >   
   > >They're also amazingly defensive of material they aren't remotely   
   > >familiar with.  The one extolling the virtues of Voyager and Enterprise   
   > >clearly didn't actually watch it, or, at the very least, didn't pay   
   > >attention.   
   >   
   > Oh they did...  I was with them through both newsgroups and   
   > were fucking flooding the threads with their hot lady spunk, either on   
   > the fact that Janeway was a competent Captain or the T&A of 7 of 69 on   
   > Voyager...  Or how "fresh" Enterprise was.   
   >   
   > In the years that I had participated in those groups, it   
   > rapidly became obvious that the mantra of these cows was "Bad Trek is   
   > infinitely better than NO Trek".  An attitude that continues to   
   > permeate the fanbase to this day.   
      
   Most so-called "fans" are fly-by-night psuedo-fans happy with any old crap   
   as long as it has "Star Trek" in the title (or in the case of Enterprise,   
   assumed to be in the title) OR they simply flit from one new toy to the   
   next no matter what it is. Slap a "Star Trek" label on Barney and many of   
   these morons will happily watch that believing it actually is "Star   
   Trek".   :-(   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)