XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv   
   From: ahk@chinet.com   
      
   thinbluemime  wrote:   
   >On Wed, 22 May 2013 04:41:11 +0100, Adam H. Kerman  wrote:   
   >>BTR1701  wrote:   
   >>>YourName@YourISP.com (Your Name) wrote:   
      
   >>>> Most so-called "fans" are fly-by-night psuedo-fans   
      
   >>>In other words, they're people who can go enjoy a Star Trek movie once   
   >>>every few years without hysterically obsessing over every detail and   
   >>>acting like their entire world is coming to an end because Abrams   
   >>>changed the number of head ridges on the Klingons or any of a myriad   
   >>>other insignificant details.   
      
   >>I find I can't enjoy Star Trek without the over-the-top moralizing,   
   >>PC-er than thou, and unsubtle life lessons For Our Times. Also, the   
   >>absurdly short '60's cheesecake uniforms worn by the women. And where's   
   >>the Shat's acting?   
      
   >Other than Abrams doesn't give a Shat, you will find all the prerequisites   
   >for your enjoyment included in the latest Trek installment.   
      
   >As a bonus, Kirk even get a piece of tail.   
      
   I like the Orphan Black reference!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)