XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv
From: davidjohnston29@block.com
On 5/21/2013 3:43 PM, Dano wrote:
> "David Johnston" wrote in message news:kngb77$ch$1@dont-email.me...
>
> On 5/21/2013 6:03 AM, Merrick Baldelli wrote:
>> On Sun, 19 May 2013 07:38:54 -0700, anim8rFSK
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> Sorry, won't happen. Why? Because Trek Fans are a
>>>> dysfunctional bunch. Most of the ones that I've encountered will take
>>>> any and all shit shoveled to them on a plate and eat it.
>>>
>>> They're also amazingly defensive of material they aren't remotely
>>> familiar with. The one extolling the virtues of Voyager and Enterprise
>>> clearly didn't actually watch it, or, at the very least, didn't pay
>>> attention.
>>
>> Oh they did... I was with them through both newsgroups and
>> were fucking flooding the threads with their hot lady spunk, either on
>> the fact that Janeway was a competent Captain or the T&A of 7 of 69 on
>> Voyager... Or how "fresh" Enterprise was.
>>
>> In the years that I had participated in those groups, it
>> rapidly became obvious that the mantra of these cows was "Bad Trek is
>> infinitely better than NO Trek".
>
> Hey if Trek fans didn't think that bad trek was better than no trek, TNG
> would never have survived into a second season.
>
> ==========================================
>
> Whatever. You have quite a high opinion of yourself that you would
> appear to feel your opinion holds more validity than mine and the
> millions of other TNG fans who liked it.
There are millions of people who like NuTrek as well. But bear
in mind that I wasn't talking about TNG in its entirety. I was talking
about just the first season of it. And I believe my opinion, that the
show was struggling at first but managed to find its feet at about the
same time that Riker grew the beard is quite widespread. It's even a
tvtrope.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/GrowingTheBeard
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
