XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv   
   From: janeanddano@yahoo.com   
      
   "David Johnston"  wrote in message news:kngb77$ch$1@dont-email.me...   
      
   On 5/21/2013 6:03 AM, Merrick Baldelli wrote:   
   > On Sun, 19 May 2013 07:38:54 -0700, anim8rFSK    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>> Sorry, won't happen.  Why?  Because Trek Fans are a   
   >>> dysfunctional bunch.  Most of the ones that I've encountered will take   
   >>> any and all shit shoveled to them on a plate and eat it.   
   >>   
   >> They're also amazingly defensive of material they aren't remotely   
   >> familiar with.  The one extolling the virtues of Voyager and Enterprise   
   >> clearly didn't actually watch it, or, at the very least, didn't pay   
   >> attention.   
   >   
   > Oh they did...  I was with them through both newsgroups and   
   > were fucking flooding the threads with their hot lady spunk, either on   
   > the fact that Janeway was a competent Captain or the T&A of 7 of 69 on   
   > Voyager...  Or how "fresh" Enterprise was.   
   >   
   > In the years that I had participated in those groups, it   
   > rapidly became obvious that the mantra of these cows was "Bad Trek is   
   > infinitely better than NO Trek".   
      
   Hey if Trek fans didn't think that bad trek was better than no trek, TNG   
   would never have survived into a second season.   
      
   ==========================================   
      
   Whatever.  You have quite a high opinion of yourself that you would appear   
   to feel your opinion holds more validity than mine and the millions of other   
   TNG fans who liked it.  Hell...the show ran for SEVEN years.   
   Personally...I've always held that rendition in higher regard than the   
   original series.  Tastes DO vary,  Doesn't make me "right" or you "wrong"   
   for that matter.  Just means we don't share identical tastes.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)