Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc    |    Miscellaneous topics pertaining to Star    |    25,718 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 25,113 of 25,718    |
|    Sandman to Your Name    |
|    Re: [NEWS] Star Wars: Episode VII Millen    |
|    23 Sep 14 12:25:44    |
      XPost: alt.fan.starwars, rec.arts.sf.movies       From: mr@sandman.net              In article <230920140856147705%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name        YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:              >> > The franchise was fine and (mostly) consistent and fitting together.       >>       >> Hahahaha!!!       >       > There's very little in the movies that doesn't fit.              There are tons of things that doesn't "fit", but that isn't the main       problem with the wreck that is the prequels. It's the lack of story,       characters, pacing and special effects that's the problem.              >> Yeah, because George Lucas never did anything to maximize profit, duh.       >       > Profit isn't the problem. Screwing up the franchise is.              Yes, that was his problem.              >> I would rather have a Star Wars fan work with the franchise than someone as       >> George Lucas, who seemingly knows very little about what made Star Wars       >> what it was.       >       > And therein lies the problem with "fan" made garbage. They don't know       > what makes the franchise what it is ... they only know what they want       > the franchise to be, which is two entirely different things.              Uh, George Lucas didn't know what made the "franchise" what it was, that's       why we got the prequel mess.              >> GL did one great movie in the hostry of the world, and that was Star Wars,       >> what made the franchise great was that someone else made the two sequels.       >> Then he decided some decades down the line that he should make more movies,       >> and do them himself, but he forgot to make movies. Or maybe he never did,       >> and he just got insanely lucky with the first one.       >       > George Lucas was the one with the ideas for the entire fanchise (the       > movie side of it anyway).              Ideas are one thing, and in 20 years, he had run out of good ideas as well.              > Whether he actually makes the movies or someone else does isn't relevant              Uh, yeah it is - since all the movies he has made save one has been utter       garbage, it's a clear sign that it's pretty relevant.              > - he's the one who should be always in charge of them since he created       > the idea and he knows what it should be.              What he supposedly "knows" is of no concern to me, the movie-goer. He made       three prequel-movies that weren't even a faint shadow of the original       trilogy.              Instead of listing the million things wrong with the prequels, I'll list       what was good about them:              1. The music       2. Less Jar Jar in two movies       3. There is no third point                     --       Sandman[.net]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca