Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc    |    Miscellaneous topics pertaining to Star    |    25,718 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 25,116 of 25,718    |
|    Cyber kNight to Your Name    |
|    =?utf-8?Q?Re:=20[NEWS]=20Star=20Wa?==?ut    |
|    01 Oct 14 18:28:31    |
      From: darth_azrael@yahoo.com              Your Name wrote on Wed, 01 October 2014 17:08              >> Someone else taking over the helm of Star Wars was       inevitable. George Lucas       >> won't live forever.              >The Star Wars franchise (as well as the other Lucasfilm       franchise like       >Indiana Jones) should have been given over, under       watertight legal red       >tape, to the stewardship of Rick McCallum and others       already within the       >Lucasfilm franchise.              Given? In what kind of dream world does this happen? Having       said that, LucasFilm still exists (although owned by Disney)       and many of the people that were working there before Disney       are still working there now (although not Rick McCallum).       Others who have been involved in past Star Wars films (e.g.       Lawrence Kasdan who co-wrote Empire Strikes Back, Return of       the Jedi and Raiders of the Lost Ark) are also involved in       the new films. It's not like there is no continuity.              >> This fact by itself doesn't mean the Star Wars franchise       will get better       >> or worse. That remains to be seen. But from the position       of a fan, even if       >> mediocre Star Wars movies get released on a regular       basis this is better       >> than none for the rest of my life              >*Only* if those movies, novels, etc. actually fit with the       established       >franchise. Some new moron(s) going off making huge changes       to suit       >themselves is not wanted by any real fan of any franchise.       Such things       >simply create a complete mess of the franchise.       >       >JJ Abrams claims to be a fan of Star Wars, and yet in other       franchises       >we have already seen so-called "fans" produce ill-fitting       rubbish full       >of their own silly ideas of what that franchise "should be"       rather than       >sticking to what the franchise actually is.              So why assume the worst?              >> which is what we likely would have got from George       Lucas.              >Apparently that is wrong since George Lucas was reportedly       already       >working on a sequel Trilogy before he sold out to Disney.       >       >No Star Wars ever again is much better than ill-fitting       rubbish that       >confuses and destroys the franchise.              And George Lucas is also reportedly collaborating on the new       films. Again, why assume the new movies will be 'ill-fitting       rubbish'? The prequel trilogy was mediocre at best when       compared with the original, regardless of how well it 'fit       in'. Abrams doesn't have to do much to improve on that.       These movies aren't a 'reboot' like the Trek movies and at       this point I don't think we have any reason to believe they       won't 'fit' with the established (movie) franchise. What       other franchises are you referring to?       --       --> http://www.megalextoria.com/forum2 <--              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca