From: YourName@YourISP.com   
      
   In article , Sandman   
    wrote:   
   > In article <031020140915046503%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name   
   >  wrote:   
   > > In article , Sandman   
   > >  wrote:   
   > >> In article <021020141316222931%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name   
   > >>  wrote:   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> And George Lucas is also reportedly collaborating on the new films.   
   > >> >   
   > >> > No. George Lucas is an honorary adisor. He has absolutely no legal say   
   > >> > in what can and cannot happen - that is now the decision of JJ Abrams,   
   > >> > and Disney and Lucasfilm management.   
   > >>   
   > >> Yes, that's great. So he couldn't possibly mess up the sequels like he did   
   > >> the prequels. Very good.   
   > >   
   > > And here we have the typical so-called "fan" who doesn't really give a   
   > > damn the franchise nor what is done as long as "I think it's good".   
   > > :-\   
   >   
   > Uh, because supposed "fans" should blindly love everything that has "Star   
   > Wars" on it? How about some critical thinking?   
      
   I never said that, but that is opinions. I do not deal with worthless   
   opinions since everyone's are different. I'm talking about facts and   
   changes.   
      
      
   > I care very much about the franchise, which is pretty obvious from my   
   > expressed joy of not having George Lucas being able to destroy it further.   
      
   Nope. That shows you "care" about your own enjoyment and the worthless   
   opinion of "it's good" / "it's bad" ... if you really cared about the   
   franchise you'd be worried about whether or not it fits with   
   established facts, established styles, etc.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)