Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc    |    Miscellaneous topics pertaining to Star    |    25,718 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 25,237 of 25,718    |
|    Sandman to Your Name    |
|    Re: The Force Awakens (SPOILERS!!!!!!)    |
|    19 Dec 15 09:55:44    |
      From: mr@sandman.net              In article <191220151253094269%YourName@YourISP.com>, Your Name wrote:              > > > > C'Pi:       > > > > It's not the heroes journey premise that bugs me. That,       > > > > at least is expected. It's all the little things copied what       > > > > we had already seen in the movies. you listed many of them.       > > > > There were just so many it took me out of the movie. When they       > > > > showed the giant death star planet, I could help but think to       > > > > myself, 'really, are you shitting me?' There was just so much       > > > > of that. These are the things that keep me from calling it a       > > > > great movie. It's why I feel it's just ok. That and the pace       > > > > of the movies. Everything was always frantic and rushed. The       > > > > original movies weren't like that. That's just J.J.'s style       > > > > and I could have done without it and I think it was the major       > > > > reason I did not feel like I was watching a Star Wars movie.       > > > > No matter what the flaws of the PT, I still felt like I was in       > > > > the Star Wars universe. A huge diverse universe. Not one       > > > > were everything seems to be happening in the same place.       > > > > Destroy a cluster of planets and now the entire Republic is       > > > > destroyed? And it can all be seen from whatever place the       > > > > first order and resistance is located? Seeing nothing really       > > > > new shrank the Star Wars universe. Not that I blame J.J. for       > > > > that. That's Disney and their rush to get these movies out.       > > > > One more year of planning and developing would have help I       > > > > think. Maybe then they would have realized that the       > > > > stormtrooper with whatever that was battling Fin with a       > > > > lightsaber was just dumb. And Han has never fired Chewie's       > > > > gun? Ever? And Han is surprised by it? After decades       > > > > together? Dumb.       > > >       > > > Your Name:       > > > Pretty much every review I se is saying this new movie is       > > > basically just a re-hash of the original move / Original trilogy       > > > with Jar Jar Abrams' own silly fank-wank ideas and Political       > > > Correctness idiocy thrown in. Just another in the ever-growing       > > > list of Hollyweird reboot fad crap (even if it is a slightly       > > > better fit than most of them). :-(       > >       > > > Of course it was almost certainly going to be a disappointment.       > > > Even ignoring the massive expectancy from fans and the       > > > over-hyping it got, it was simply stupid to try and extend the       > > > Saga in the first place and even stupider to do it without       > > > George Lucas' involvement.       > >       > > Sandman:       > > It's George Lucas that got us the prequel train wreck, thank god       > > he wasn't around to ruin this movie as well.       >       > Jar Jar Abrams has managed to ruin the franchise all by himself ...              Like I said, that was done with the prequels idiocy and George Lucas. Stop       trying to fool yourself.              > which was virtually a foregone conclusion since he's already ruined       > everything else he's got his sticky talentless mitts on. :-(              Your mother?              --       Sandman              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca